1. ZB# 00-18
  2. Domlnao Marcano
  3. 48-2-2 0
      1. APPLICATION FEE (DUE AT TIME OF FILING OF APPLICATION)
      2. RESIDENTLU.: $50.00
      3. COMMERCIAL: $150.00
      4. AREA USE
      5. 468 2260
      6. i: B a 1170030': »''.E.flODta')DD"'fe g^a&o
      7. DOMINGO MARCANO
      8. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
      9. BE IT FURTHER
  4. TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
      1. TOWN HALL, 555 UNION AVENUE NEW WINDSOR, NEW YORK 12553
  5. cy- ^/J ^
  6. TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
      1. TOWN HALL, 555 UNION AVENUE NEW WINDSOR, NEW YORK 12553
  7. c t
  8. aoz r4
  9. <$l^^ ^
      1. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSrTOWN OF NEW WINDSOR COUNTY OF ORANGE:STATE OF NEW YORK
      2. AFRDAVrr OF
      3. In the Matter of the Application for Variance of
      4. STATE OF NEW YORK)
      5. ) SS.:
      6. COUNTY OF ORANGE )
      7. PATRICIA A. CORSETn, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
      8. Notary Public
      9. Sworn to before me this
      10. day of , 20 .
      11. Notary Public
  10. RECEIPT #452-2000
  11. Town of New Windsor
  12. Assessors Office
      1. OH /
  13. ^^ /30Q^ 1
      1. '^'""wlMlj
  14. 1 _J lj
      1. i — I—r
  15. S'lO/^' t)f^
  16. pfj//'"^^
    1. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
  17. Owner of itemises. tAMLiAHO^ t)omA/&-o ^ M^y'A'^O^^A
  18. Address ()1 lAfK^t17S Dfi3V/i
  19. Phcne 5^/ - /^g /
  20. Name of Architect Dp
      1. \j/i }\AA>\^^
  21. PA^5^> v/yy/V /^^J/ />\f^ufA[iB y
  22. OW/A
      1. Chairman I
      2. TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
      3. APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
      4. Date: Ju/ift t^ ^'Dt>tX
      5. (Name, address and phone of Applic^rrt) v) (Owner)
      6. ^Applicant information: ' - (^"«^^t^^^* !
  23. 'Er*-^
      1. (Applicant)
      2. (b) Variance: Granted ( ) Denied (
      3. (c) Restrictions or conditions:
      4. (ZBA DISK#7-080991.AP)
    1. •^i^
      1. \)\>''^'^
      2. RECEIVED
      3. TOWN HALL, 555}UNION AVENUE NEW WINDSOR, NEW YORK 12553
      4. .,19.
  24. 22Z Oz.
  25. S =3 I
      1. €> 5-.
    1. NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
      1. O^r^lt^^ pUlC/fA\£0 JrJ fCj^Sf.

ZB# 00-18

Back to top


Domlnao Marcano

Back to top


48-2-2 0


/
^
^(^
y

ORANGE COUNTY~NE
csMHT ,
fD«*H) II. lAi(nnlculot»H) ||,f;A^C)
STAT??, HIGHWAYS
w v <«TaTr MWV wn 17
Photo Noi
!l,-l!..L?,2..i5?..*..
(',v*!<w r,r\ J
Cbi^rt^f
pfviO:
?»-<""
|(m'f»**^«««ia»»»t'f<Nl'»'»»«»il
6 S-
' Wi«i)l^,.
$CQUt
3 «
iC)C
s.
t 0WtMMl<«>»4
pm
»w»««,lii«.|»«»(»4

APPLICATION FEE (DUE AT TIME OF FILING OF APPLICATION)
APPLICANT:
nij^lttinO.
PptAAAAA?
.
FILE#_
RESIDENTLU.:
$50.00
(BSTERPRETATION:
$150.0O)
COMMERCIAL: $150.00
AREA
USE
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FEE
$ ^0.(^
-^(^^^\^ ^
'
\ V
t'^
ESCROW DEPOSIT FOR CONSULTANT FEES
^ 3SSbML
DISBURSEMENTS:
Sl'ENOGRAPHER CHARGES: $4.50 PER PAGE
H
(yO
V'v^"^
PRELIMINARY MEETING-PER PAGE>
2ND PRELIMINARY- PER PAGE.
3RD PRELIMINARY- PERPAGE
$
PUBLIC HEARING- PERPAGE
$"
PUBLIC HEARING (CONT'D) PER PAGE
$
TOTAL
$ .^ .
6'0
ATTORNEY'S FEES: $35.00 PER MEEETING
PRELIM. MEETING:
.^LwjAk
$
c^.f.OO
2ND PRELIM
llllil-UO
$ 3^ .fTf)
3RD PRELIM.
$
PUBLIC HEARING.
$
PUBLIC HEARING (CONT'D)
$
TOTAL
$
9-0-00
MISC. CHARGES:
$
TOTAL
$
/o(^S0
LESS ESCROW DEPOSIT
$
^00 .00
(ADDL. CHARGES DUE)
,. $
REFUND DUE TO APPLICANT. .$
/^I -^^

CiQfc-faCitiiutMi
GUAnOtANA SAFETY GneEN WON
ALEJANDRINA MARCANO
DOMINGO MARCANO
53 LAFAYETTE DR.
NEW WINDSOR, NY 12553
29-7003/2213
468
2260
Date,
o_Ci
Paytx)the,--r—
Order of \ ^
-^ ^
ll
Dollars
BsSsT
i: B a 1170030': »''.E.flODta')DD"'fe g^a&o
^$;yw£su^.
CcAAJC>)iir
GUMVtAN» SAFETY OffiEN ««GN

NEW WINDSOR ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
48-2-20
In the Matter of the Application of
DOMINGO MARCANO
#00-18.
MEMORANDUM OF
DECISION GRANTING
AREA VARIANCE &
INTERPRETATION
-X
WHEREAS, DOMINGO MARCANO,
residing at 53 Lafayette Drive, New Windsor,
New York 12553, has made application before the Zoning Board of Appeals for a 40 ft. 6 in.
front yard variance for existing deck and interpretation of existing single-family residence at 53
Lafayette Drive an R-5 zone; and
WHEREAS,
a public hearing was held on the 26th day of June, 2000 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals at the Town Hall, New Windsor, New York; and
WHEREAS,
Applicant was represented by Michele Lee Neusch, Esq.; and
WHEREAS,
there were two spectators appearing at the public hearing; and
WHEREAS,
one spectator spoke regarding the interpretation question and was satisfied
when the Applicant's attorney stated that the residence would be single-family only; and
WHEREAS,
a decision was made by the Zoning Board of Appeals on the date of the
public hearing granting the application; and
WHEREAS,
the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Windsor sets forth the
following findings in this matter here memorialized in furtherance of its previously made decision
in this matter:
1. The notice of public hearing was duly sent to residents and businesses as prescribed by
law and in The Sentinel, also as required by law.
2. The evidence presented by the Applicant showed that:
(a) The property is a residential property consisting of a one-family home located in a
neighborhood containing one-family homes.
(b) The Applicants are the contract-purchasers of the house.
(c) The house had a finished basement but has no locked-ofFarea and is operated
internally as a one-family home.

(d) The property has always been operated as a single-family home and the Applicant
seeks to operate it as a single-family home in the future.
(e) The house has a deck on it which has been in existence for approximately ten years
and is similar to other decks in the neighborhood.
(f) The property is so located that it has two front yards although it appears visually
only to have a front yard and two side yards.
(g) It is necessary to have the deck on the property because anybody exiting the house
would probably suffer serious injury through a fall if the deck were not there.
(h) The deck is not constructed on top of any well or septic system, any sewer
easement or water easement.
(i) The deck does not interfere with the course of water drainage or cause any
ponding or collection of water.
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of the Town of New Windsor makes the following
conclusions of law here memorialized in fiirtherance of its previously made decision in this matter:
1. The home as it exists as it has been used and as it will be used is a one-family home.
2. The requested variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the
neighborhood or create a detriment to nearby properties.
3. There is no other feasible method available to the Applicant which can produce the
benefits sought.
4. The variance requested is substantial in relation to the Town regulations but
nevertheless are warranted for the reasons listed above.
5. The requested variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or
environmental conditions in the neighborhood or zoning district.
6. The difficulty the Applicant faces in conforming to the bulk regulations is self-created
but nevertheless should be allowed.
7. The benefit to the Applicant, if the requested variance is granted, outweighs the
detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community.
8. The requested variance is appropriate and the minimum variance necessary and
adequate to allow the Applicant relief from the requirements of the Zoning Local Law and at the
same time preserve and protect the character of the neighborhood and the health, safety and
welfare of the community.

»^
9. The interests of justice will be served by allowing the granting of the requested area
variance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,
that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New Windsor GRANT a
request for a 40 ft. 6 in front yard variance for existing deck and interpretation that a single-family
home exists at 53 Lafayette Drive, in an R-5 zone as sought by the Applicant in accordance with
plans filed with the Building Inspector and presented at the public hearing.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED,
that the Secretary of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of New
Windsor transmit a copy of this decision to the Town Clerk, Town Planning Board and Applicant.
Dated: September 11, 2000.

Date
TO

Back to top


TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
TOWN HALL, 555 UNION AVENUE
NEW WINDSOR, NEW YORK 12553
Vt
c^V
..,1^........
DR.
-^/^^.M.M.,..As^
DATE
'oo
/^iA^/z^
^ dra^ ^ /lP<s^^2/i^
'
-^no-VR
/Z^^ifm:^^^-^rd^hi^iy
11K)J^.

Back to top


cy-
^/J
^
'-
CLAD 4ED
SO
ALL
OWED

TO
Date
7jj4C:y.
..19.

Back to top


TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
TOWN HALL, 555 UNION AVENUE
NEW WINDSOR, NEW YORK 12553
Frances Roth
DR.
DATE
CLAIMED
ALLOWED
(^/a^/zL
7/».7,.
^
,
hd>^r€/
// A
^
Is-
CO)
U'h'iO ' I

Back to top


c
t
/^dhucj
—0~~
A/A-^s-

Back to top


aoz
r4

Back to top


<$l^^
^

June 26, 2000
34
DOMINGO MARCANO
MR. NUGENT: Request for 4 0 ft. 6 in. front yard
variance for existing deck and interpretation of
existing single-family residence at 53 Lafayette Drive
in an R-5 zone. Is there anyone here for Domingo
Marcano, other than the applicant? Would you like to
sign in, please?
MS. CORSETTI: For the record, I have 22 letters that
went out to adjacent property owners on June 13.
Michele Lee Neusch, Esq. appeared before the board for
this proposal.
MS. NEUSCH: Okay, good evening, gentlemen, the
Marcanos are seeking an interpretation as to what one
family residence, the home when they purchased it in
1987, had finished basement, it was handicapped
accessible, while the prior owners had a family member
who's a relative who's handicapped. There is, I
believe, a diagram, I don't know whether or not it's
presented of the area in question, does everyone have a
copy? There's a diagram clearly demonstrates there's
no privacy, this area, the large area that's sort of to
the left of the kitchen, ray left, anyway, the kitchen
area has no door, the stairs at the top of the stairs
is Mrs. Marcano's kitchen, there's a clear sliding door
there, there's no way to lock that. The Marcanos have
never rented it. They purchased it as single family
home, they have listed it as single family home, in
fact, have a purchaser who's willing to purchase the
home as a single family home. Additionally, they use
the kitchen and the laundry room, it's the only laundry
room on the premises. And they are the sole occupants
currently on the premises.
MR. KRIEGER: It's now a single family home, it's
always been run as a single family home and they seek
to run it as a single family home in the future?
MS. NEUSCH: Yes.
MR, TORLEY: And the purchasers would so stipulate?

June 2 6, 2 0 00
3 5
MS. NEUSCH: Yes, they would, and I would hand a copy
of the listing for this premises which states that it
is listed as a single family home.
MR. KANE: They have lived there, one electrical meter
coming into the house?
MS. NEUSCH: One, yes.
MR. KANE: It's always been that way?
MS. NEUSCH: Yes.
MR. KANE: Any complaints, formal or informal, that you
know of as the house being used as a two-family house?
MS. NEUSCH: The only notice of any type of violation
was when the premises, when the Marcanos actually
received a notice of disapproval with respect to the
finished basement, other than that, they have not
received any.
MR. KRIEGER: Larry, with respect to the purchasers,
the since, it's on the record if the Zoning Board of
Appeals should find as a matter of interpretation that
that's a one-family house, they are bound by that, it's
not a question of they are stipulating to it, they are
bound by it.
MR. TORLEY: Okay, want to make sure that they're
aware.
MS. NEUSCH: Yes, they are.
MR. REIS: Talk about the deck.
MS. NEUSCH: With regard to the deck, the deck has been
I believe photographs that were submitted, the deck has
been in existence since 1990. I guess it overshoots
the property line, actually where they are allowed to
build and they need a variance approximately 40 feet
wide to allow for the deck.
MR. KRIEGER: It appears that this house is located in
essence on a corner so it has two street frontages,

June 26, 2000
36
even though functionally, it has a front yard and side
yard, they are by law treated as two front yards.
MS. NEUSCH: That's correct.
MR. KANE: Got it, thank you.
MS. NEUSCH: Additionally, the Marcanos, if they are
required to remove the deck, it would certainly detract
from the value of the home and it would be expensive
for them to have to replace a deck with a deck that
actually would fit within the actual deck.
MR. KANE: Having no deck, it would be a safety hazard?
MS. NEUSCH: Yes, it would.
MR. KRIEGER: The deck is not constructed over the top
of any well or septic system, any sewer easement or
water easement?
MS. NEUSCH: No.
MR. KRIEGER: And it doesn't interfere with the course
of water drainage or cause any ponding or collection of
water?
MS. NEUSCH: Not that I am aware of.
MR. REIS: Open it up to the public.
MR. NUGENT: Not yet. I think we're going to have do
this one again in two pieces.
MR. REIS: Take the interpretation first.
MR. NUGENT: Take the interpretation and then the
variance but I will open it up to the public at this
time and try not to be repetitious and direct your
questions to the Chair, state your name. You can stay
right there. State your name so she can get it.
MS. BEYERS: Marsha Beyers, B-E-Y-E-R-S. First, I want
to clarify that we live directly next door to the
Marcanos, we used to be 18, they used to be 20, our

June 26, 2000
37
houses both face the same direction, don't ask me what
happened to 55 and 57, when they renumbered the street,
there are no 55 and 57, so I wanted to point out that
our lots join and our houses are right next door to
each other. To tell you the truth, we didn't really
know what this meeting was going to be about because
the letter here says interpretation as to single
family. We have lived at 59, the old 18 for 30 years
and all the houses, it's a dead-end street, Lafayette
Drive was never completed, it's dead-end on two ends, I
don't know what your map shows, but it was never
completed. We have no problem with the deck because
that's on the other end of the house on the corner.
That's at the other end. The bedroom end of the house
is outside our kitchen door, as to if I overheard here
correctly, they are selling the house as a single
family residence, that was our only concern for coming
here because the letter said interpretation, we didn't
really know the reason for the meeting. All the houses
on the street are single families, even though I am
well aware that it's zoned two family. But Lafayette
Drive has been there since the '50's, there's one
duplex that's always been a duplex so we really have no
problem with anything that's going go on here tonight,
if the house is going to be sold as a single family
because the previous owners, the Cowans, they are the
ones who made the downstairs into a separate apartment.
And his grandmother or her grandmother and aunt, I'm
not sure which, lived down there. But the house then
was sold to the Marcanos as a single family residence,
they tried, I have to admit, they tried to sell it and
they, not the Marcanos, I'm talking about the Cowans,
they had it advertised let your tenant pay the
mortgage, they tried to sell it as a two family, that
was about ten years ago, but they couldn't then so to
my knowledge, it's always been a single family
residence. That's all.
MR. NUGENT: Thank you, ma'am.
MR. KRIEGER: And this deck is similar to other decks
in the neighborhood, not identical, but other houses?
MS. BEYERS: I have no problem with the deck.

June 26,2000
38
MR. KRIEGER: I understand, I just want to know from
you because you're a neighborhood for the record.
MS. BEYERS: There are other decks in the neighborhood,
yes, outside.
MR. KRIEGER: Thank you, that's what I was asking,
thank you.
MS. SAKEL: I'm the realtor, Priscilla Sakel, I sold
the Marcano's house is to a very nice young couple with
a new baby, they are very excited to have it and it's
going to be a one family home for them.
MR. NUGENT: Any further questions? There's no future
questions, I'll close the public helping and open it
back up to the board and I think we should address each
one individually.
MR. TORLEY: I think as far as interpretation, it's
been clear that this is, this has been a single family
house intended to be maintained as such.
MR. KANE: I agree and I make a motion for the record
that we vote that way.
MR. TORLEY: I will second it.
ROLL CALL
MR. MCDONALD
AYE
MR. REIS
AYE
MR. TORLEY
AYE
MR. KANE
AYE
MR. NUGENT
AYE
MR. NUGENT: Next one is the deck.
MR. KANE: I move that we approve the requested
variance for a deck at 53 Lafayette Drive.
MR. REIS: Second it.
ROLL CALL

June 26, 2000
39
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MR.
MCDONALD
REIS
TORLEY
KANE
NUGENT
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE
AYE

^Hl
hmm
I'l nuMi/j
-yeMA/tA '•
W[(UCMJ>
, J^iftuLA/^
^^'
'a^'/f
.
ilIn l
Mh^ii
W^f
l^^J^^^^^^i^.
^ ^
Hi
iM
ill
t
3~f
aUJ
••>,
i4=
in
Hi
! i!

45-3-6 AMANATIDES, KATHY
AREA VARIANCE
#98-42
GRANTED 11/09/98
12 CANNON DRIVE
R-4 ZONE
REQUEST FOR 5 FT. 6 IN. SIDE YARD AND 6 FT. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISHNG METAL
SHED, AND 7 FT. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISTING DECK AT 12 CANNON DRIVE IN AN R-4 ZONE.
47-2-5
HUSTED, ROBERT
AREA VARIANCE #99-17 GRANTED 06/14/99
7 GARDEN DRIVE
R-4 ZONE
REQUEST GRANTED FOR 8 FT. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISHNG ABOVE-GROUND POOL AT
THE ABOVE RESIDENCE.
48-1-3.1 COLONI, RICHARD B.
AREA
GRANTED ON 05/11/98
3011 ROUTE 9W
R-4 ZONE
#98-13
REQUEST GRANTED FOR 10 FT. FRONT YARD AND 2 FT. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISHNG
DECKS AT 3011 ROUTE 9W IN AN R-4 ZONE.
48-2-20 MARCANO, DOMINGO
INTERPRETATION/AREA
GRANTED: 06/26/00
53 LAFAYETTE DRIVE
#00-22
R-5 ZONE
REQUEST GRANTED FOR A 40 FT. 6 IN. FRONT YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISTING DECK AND
INTERPRETRATION OF EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 53 LAFAYETTE DRIVE. ZBA DETERMINED
THAT THE RESIDENCE IS A SINGLE-FAMILY ONLY AND CANNOT BE USED AS A TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE.
48-3-2.2 TOYOTA OF NEWBURGH, INC. US^AREA #85-39
GRANTED
96 ROUTE 9W
N.C. FRONT/R-5 REAR
11/85
REQUEST FOR (1) 20 FT. FRONT YARD VARIANCE ON RT. 9W, (2) 20 FT. FRONT YARD ON
LAFAYETTE FOR CONSTRUCHON OF I STORY STRUCTURE FOR AUTO SERVICE AND REPAIR, PLUS
(48-2.6.2) 6 FT. BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR CONSTRUCnON OF NEW TWO-STORY
STRUCTURE FOR AUTO PARTS SALES AND OFFICE TOGETHER WITH USE VARIANCE FOR CAR
STORAGE IN R-5 ZONE.
48.3.3.1 TOYOTA OF NEWBURGH, INC. SIGN VARIANCE
GRANTED
2934 (96) ROUTE 9W
#97-41 SIGN VARIANCE
11/24/97
REQUEST FOR
17 FT. SIGN WIDTH VARIANCE FOR FACIA SIGN WHICH WILL BE LETTERS TOYOTA
NEWBURGH" WFTH LOGO ON MAIN BUILDING FACING ROUTE 9W. FOR OTHER VARIANCES PREVIOUSLY
GRANTED, SEE ZBA DISK #11.
48-4-11 WELLER,FRED
AREA VARIANCES
GRANTED
06/08/98
18 NEE AVENUE
#98-20
R-4 ZONE
REQUEST FOR 8 FT. SIDE YARD AND 6 FT. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISTING 12 X 12 FT.
SHED AT ABOVE RESIDENCE.
49-4-5 VASQUEZ, CARLOS
AREA VARIANCES GRANTED
18 PROVOST DRIVE
#96-19
R-4 ZONE
07/08/96
REQUEST FOR I FT. 7 IN. REAR YARD VARIANCE FOR EXISTING ADDHTON AND I FT. 6 IN. SIDE
YARD PLUS 3 FT. 4 IN. REAR YARD VARIANCES FOR EXISTING SHED LOCATED AT ABOVE RESIDENCE. ALL
VARIANCES GRANTED.
50-2-13 ANDREWS, RICHARD & RUTH
AREA VARIANCE
GRANTED

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSrTOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
COUNTY OF ORANGE:STATE OF NEW YORK
•X
AFRDAVrr OF
In the Matter of the Application for Variance of
STATE OF NEW YORK)
) SS.:
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
PATRICIA A. CORSETn, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
That I am not a party to the action, am over 18 years of age and reside at
7 Franklin Avenue, New Windsor, N. Y. 12553.
That on the
day of _
I compared the
addressed envelopes containing the Public Hearing Notice pertinent to this case
with the certified list provided by the Assessor regarding the above application
for a variance and I find that the addresses are identical to the list received. I
then caused the envelopes to be deposited in a U.S. Depository within the Town
of New Windsor.
Notary Public
Sworn to before me this
day of
, 20
.
Notary Public

Town of New Windsor
555 Union Avenue
New Windsor. NY 12553
(914)58^611

Back to top


RECEIPT
#452-2000
06/13/2000
Marcano.AleJandrina
Received $ 50.00 for Zorang Board Fees, on 06/13/2000. Thanic you for stopping by the Town Clerics
office.
As always, i is our pteasure to serve you.
Dorothy H.Hansen
Towi Clerk

i \.
,-r

Back to top


Town of New Windsor
555 Union Avenue
New Windsor, New York 12553
Telephone: (914) 563-4631
Fax: (914) 563-4693

Back to top


Assessors Office
May 9, 2000
Domingo Marcano
53 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
Re: 48-2-20
Dear Mr. Marcano,
According to our records, the attached list of property owners are within five hundred (500) feet
of the above referenced property.
The charge for this service is $45.00, minus your deposit of $25.00.
Please remit the balance of $20.00 to the Town Clerk's Office.
Sincerely,
Leslie Cook
Sole Assessor
LC/h-d
Attachments
CC: Pat Corsetti, ZBA

Dori Associates
hW
,
PO Box 4097
New Windsor, NY 12553
Myron & Eleanor Rhodesr
70 Lafayette Drive
^
New Windsor, NY 12553
Edward & Marcia Be
>f^
59 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
Petro Realty of New York
K
,
IV^
2987 NYS Route 9W
1/
New Windsor, NY 12553
Petro Realty of New York
111 Route9W
New Windsor, NY 12553
^
J. Bonanno, M. Piazzola & G. PajJera
C/o Allstate Can Corp.
^
One Wood Hollow Road
Parsippany, NJ 07054
Plum Point Interstate Pro
2 Carpenter Place
Monroe, NY 10950
^my ^
Management
Diaime Phelan-Me
;n
i
y
47 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
Joseph
&
Mary Ellen Sayi
3011 Route 9W
New Windsor, NY 12553
6^
William & Christine McDo
27 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
i^
Leonard Carpezzi
h.*/
PO Box 631
Stony Point, NY 10980
Audrey Valicenti
/
2956 NYS Route 9W
New Windsor, NY 12553
Caroline Corey
y
t
820 S. Belair Drive
Inverness, FL 34450
Paul & Kelly SeviT
15 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
Newburgh Realty Holding Co.. jpc.
2934 Route 9W
^
New Windsor, NY 12553
Robert & Amelia Llewe
13 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
11^
ABH Corp. of NY
/
2976 NYS Route 9W
New Windsor, NY 12553
Edward & Katherine Conk]
9 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
/
Richard & Irene Pisco
/
74 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
Frank & Dorothy Jean She;
7 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
mmQ
Robert Leroy Crist Jry
72 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
Alan & Deborah Nucifoi
61 Lafayette Drive
New Windsor, NY 12553
/

OFFICE OF TI
TOW] TO
UILDING INSPECTOR
NEW WINDSOR'
ORANoii CqtUNf Y, NEW YORK
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Of BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
APPLICANT IS TO PLEASE CONTACT THE ZONING BOARD SECRETARY AT (914)563-4630 TO
MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS.
DATE: April 10,2000
APPLICANT: Domingo Marcano
53 Lafayette Dr
New Windsor, New York 12553
C/0Attorney Michael Hergenhan
37 Westwood Dr
Newburgh, 12550
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT YOUR APPLICATION DATE:
FOR : Existing deck
LOCATED AT: 53 Lafeyette Dr
ZONE: R-5
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SITE: 48-2-20
IS DISAPPROVED ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS:
1 .Existing deck built without a permit. Does not meet minimum front x'ard set-back. This is a comer let.

•jlCil)
BtqiailjqGvEvSPECTOR
PERMITTED 45*
ZONE: Ro
USE;E-5
MIN. LOT .AREA:
MIN LOT WIDTH:
REQ'D.. FRONTED:
REQ'D.SIDE\T):
REQD. TOTAL SIDE \T>:
REQ'DREAR^T):
REQ'D FRONTAGE:
\L^JC. BLDG. HT.:
FLOOR AREA R.^TI0:
MIN. LIV.ABLE AREA:
DEV. COVERAGE:
PROPOSED OR
AVAILABLE:
V.ARI.ANCE
REQL^ST:
4'-6"
40'-6"
cc: Z.B. A.. .APPLICANT. FILE AW ATTACHED MAP

^mmimmmmm
-t i
bv^--^;i^-^''-yfi.^^-^
PUEASE AaOW FIVE TO TEN DAYS TO PROCESS
U/POKTAMT
YOU MUST CAa FOR ALL REQUREO MSPECnONS OF CONSTRUCTION
Other inspections wffl be made in most cases but those listed below mu^ be made or CerSiipate
IDonotmistaice
aiunscheduted inspection for one of those listed below. Unless an inspeptij|^ report is teflon the job indicating approval of one of these inspectiOT
has not been approved aid it is improper to continue beyond that point in the worK Any disapfxoved work must be reinspected after correction.
I. When excavating is complete and footing fbnns are in place (before pouring.)
-
2- Foundation Inspection. Check here for waterproofing and footing drains. .
"
3. bi^pect gravel base under concrete floors and undersiabpiumtNng.
4. VVhen framing, rough plumbing, rough electric and before being covered.
5. insulatfon.
6. FInaiinspectfon for Certificate of Occupancy. Have on hand electricallnspecSon data and final certified plot plan. Buikiing is fo be
completed at this time. Well water test required and engineer's certificaifon tetter for septb system required.
7. Driveway inspectfon must meet approval of Town Highway Superintendent A driveway bond may be required.
8. $50.00 charge for any site that calls for the inspection twice.
9. Call 24 hours in advance, Witt] permit number, to schedule inspection.
10. There will be no inspectfons unless yeDow pemnit card is posted.
II. Sewer pennits must be obtained aking with buikiing pemiits for new houses,
12. Septk: pemnit must be submitted with engineer's drawing and perc test
13. Road opening permits must be obtained from Town Cleric's offfce.
14. Ail buikiing pennits wiH need a Certifk:ate of Occupancy or a Certificate of Compliance and here is no fee for this.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWf^ERSHIP AND/OR CONTRACTOR'S COMP & UABIUTYINSURANCE CERTIFICATE IS
REQUIRED BEFORE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY - FILL OUT ALL INFORMATION WHICH APPUES TO YOU
FOR OFFICE USE ONLX;., ^ ^ __ -
Building Permit #:_jc2i_5 "^'HT^^^
Ovmer of Premises.
Address
Phone
^^i-^W
Mailing Address.
Ml^y
yOivJi^^^N NN
IV^^ l
NameofArdiitect_
Address
n^
Phone
NaT)eofContractor_
Address
Phone
X
State whether applksnt is owner, lessee, agent. aT:hitect, engineer a buikier_
If applicant Is a corporatfon, signature of duly authorized officer.
OV^£A
(Name and titie of corp<xate officer)

1. On what street is property located? On the
t-AS'
sideot
jfir
1*^ K' Tt
QA I Vr
and Rplt^P'^.
t,-0^
feat Jm t^inL^ectlon of l^^il^^ f
DA^V ^
jjAyj
RJ.
^- W
. 2. Zong or use district in which premises are situated
4V'^'^'*Ol y^"'—^
Jy^^
property a flood zone? Y
N x\_
•' 3. Tax Map Description: Section
\
t>
Block
qi
Lot
ff
^
4. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction.
a. Existing use and occupancy
.i-j>*sfl
b. Intended use and occupancy
^ '
'^
5. Nature of work (check if applicable)
New Bldg D Addition D Alteration D
Repai[ D Removal D Demolition D Other jij*
6. Is this a comer
tot?
1 ^ -^
^^^
/
" ^
^
7. Dimensions ofentire new construction. Front \
I
Rear |
\
Depth
Height
No. of stories
'
8. If dwelling, number of dwelling units:
nK
Number of dwelling units on each floor
Number of bedrooms
>^\^^ Baths
MjA
Toilets K) U
Heating Plant Gas
^n
Oil
N A
aectric/HolAlr.
/^[A
Hot Water
/^l A
If Garage, number of cars
A^ A
9. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of eadi type of use.
10

OH /
date

Back to top


^^ /30Q^
1
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR, ORANGE COUNTY. NEW YORK
Pursuant
to
New York
State
Building
Code and
Town Ordinances
Bunding Inspector Michael L Babcocit
Asst Inspectors Frank Usi & Louis Kiychear
New Wmdsor Town HaH
555 Union Avenue
New
Windsor,
New
Yoric 12553
(914)5634618
(914)5634693 FAX
c -?
BIdginsp Examined.
Fire Insp Examined.
Approved.
Disapproved.
Perniit No.
INSTRUCTIONS
A.
This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or in ink and submitted in duplicate to the Building Inspector.
B. Plot plan shovwng location of tot and buildings on premises, relationship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and giving a detailed
description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram, which is part of this application.
C. This application must be accompanied by two complete sets of plans showing proposed construction and two complete sets of
spedfk^tions. Plans and specilications shall describe the nature of the work to be perfonned, the materials and equipment to be used and
Installed and details of structural, mechanical and plumbing Installations.
D. The work covered by this application may not be commenced before the issuance of a Building PemiiL
E. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Pennit to the applicant together v^'th approved set of plans and
specifications. Such permit and approved plans and specifications siiail be kept on the premises, available for inspection throughout the
progress of tiie work.
F. No building shall be occupied or used in whole or In part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted
by the Building Inspector,
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the BuiWing Inspector for ttie issuance of a BuiWIng Pemiit pursuant to the New York Building Construction
Code Ordinances of the Town of New Windsor for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations, or for removal or demolition or use of
property as herein descrii)ed. The applicant agrees to comply witfi all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and certifies Uiat he is tiie owner
or agent of all tiiat certain lot, piece or parcel of land and/or building described in this application and If not tiie owner, tiiat he has been duly and
)rqperiy autfiorized to make tills application and to assume responsibility for tiie owner in connection witti Oils application. , ^
U(»^o
JOA,
(S'qnature of Applicant)
^
(Address of Applicant)
^ryyCCLMMM^
(Owner's Signature)
PLOT PLAN
(Owner's Address)
AflQ^'
(
NOTE:
Locate all buiWings and indicate all set back dimensions. Applicant must indicate the
building line
or
lines cleariy and distinctly on the drawings.
'^'""wlMlj
c/<
OAA
Yjji

N
W

I
I)
^iv
ik—i
i8
J
»•
—,
»
-

Back to top


1
_J
lj
••
'i
1
_J
_J __'
—1
*\
'- - 1
'
..'
—j
1
i —
I—r
I
T—f
\
\
(uI-ov/T
/'^^^
S7Aa/VS
J I
l„.L_J_
pj^(.pji/vP
^0
f^ D
i-\
0
o
B^
VJi W

Back to top


S'lO/^'
t)f^
/
PPIii!9liliPPIffPPP<lilP9*P9««l«l
^^i^iiPPWiPiVI

/"--?-'
\
IN
Q>
n
//•
.,s,
<r/

Back to top


pfj//'"^^
•^ ;
-• v'.
(^
tv
J'
N
of
0£-^H

^
OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
APPLICANT IS TO PLEASE CONTACT THE ZONING BOARD SECRETARY AT (914) 563-4630 TO
MAKE AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE ZONEVG BOARD OF APPEALS.
DATE: 05/01/00
APPLICANT: Domingo Marcano
53 Lafayette Dr.
PLEASE TAKE
NeNOTICw WindsorE
THA
,
T
NY
YOU1255R APPLICATIO3
N DATE:
-*S
FOR ; Finished Basement (Existing)
LOCATED AT: 53 Lafeyette Dr.
ZONE: R-5
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SITE:
48-2-20
IS DISAPPROVED ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS: Interpretation (Dwelling Unit 2 Family)
1. Existing finished basement with kitchen, bathroom and sleeping facilities appears to constitute a 2
family dwelling. Applicant claims it is not a 2 family dwelling.

if^^io^'Cd^E
PERMITTED
ZONE:
USE:
MIN. LOT AREA;
MIN LOT WIDTH:
REQ-D.. FRONT YD:
REQ=D. SIDE YD:
REQD. TOTAL SIDE YD:
REQ=D REAR YD:
REQ=D FRONTAGE:
MAX. BLDG. HT.:
FLOOR AREA RATIO:
MIN. LIVABLE AREA:
DEV. COVERAGE:
-sj^'t-^ti'—-\^
PROPOSED OR
AVAILABLE:
VARIANCE
REQUEST:
y>
cc: Z.B.A.. APPLICANT, FILE. W/ATTACHED MAP

PLEASE AU.OW FIVE TO TBI DAYS TO PROCESS
YOU MUST cmfOR AUREQl^
OFCONSTmiCTlOH
'Ojv v^^r •-•"' —
Ajs
V;. Other hspecSons wi be mate in most casi^
ai unsdieduled fcispedion for one of those istad below. Unless an inspection report is left on the job indicating app^oviEri of bne'df ttieK insp«:tions it
has not been acprb^ aid it is irraxoper to continue beyond that point in the wrorit. Any disapproved
mtk
must bie reinspected after conedion.
^"VvVheriiewawaiingbcomplete aid
'^.f*71i^^^^^^^^
^ J jLXFoundallon lnsp«*xu Chedt here for waterproofing and ibofihg drains.
3.1 >spect gravel b»e Qrider concrete floors and underslab plumbing. ;!#'
4. When framing^ rough plumbing, rough electric and before being covert
5.
insulation.
.
.
.^^...v^^-^--.-:;;
6. Fmai inspection for Certificate of Occupvicy. Have on hand electrical inspecGon dataahd final certified plot plan. Building Is lo'te'
"'-'"
• completed at fliis fime; W6B water test required and engineer's certficafion letter for septic syst^ required.:;. t^iir;::"'^^--'" •
,
J- 7.^ Driveway inspedion must meet approval of Town KighwaySup^
"
8. $50.66 charge for any site that calls for the Inspection twice.
9. Call24hoursinadvance,withpermitnumber.t0 5cheduieinspedion. . I ,
10. There will be no inspections unless yellow pennit card is posted. .
11. Sewer perrnitsnuist be obtained along with building perniits for new houses.
12. Septic pertnil must be submitted wiBienglnew's drawing and perctfis^,,,.^^^^^.
13. Road opening pennits must be obtOTed from Town aerie's office.,.
.
. : .: .: t^.
14. All building perrnits wiB need a Certificate of Occupancy or a CertificatB of Compliance and here is no fee for this.
AFHDAm OF OmERSHIP AND/OR CONTRACTOR'S COMP &UAmUTYINSURANCE CERTIFICATE IS
REQUIRED BEFORE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY - FILL OUT ALL INFORMATION WHICH APPLIES TO YOU
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Building Permit #;

Back to top


Owner of itemises.
tAMLiAHO^
t)omA/&-o ^
M^y'A'^O^^A

Back to top


Address
()1
lAfK^t17S
Dfi3V/i
M«linoAdA«s
/V^^ ^
m^^i^kj fjy
p^63

Back to top


Phcne 5^/ - /^g /

Back to top


Name of Architect
Dp
Address
Name of Contractor,
Address
\j/i }\AA>\^^
Phone

Back to top


PA^5^> v/yy/V /^^J/
/>\f^ufA[iB
y
state whether af^)iicant is owner, lessee, agent, adiitect, eng^eer or builder.
If ^)pBcant is a corporafcn, sigiature of duly authorized office'.
Phone

Back to top


OW/A
(Name aid titie of corporate officer)

1. On what street is property located? On the
^3 ^
^slde of
/JIM^J^J
(^Aj^^
and
APPO>7<^
iiO^
feet from'^finTe!Ltlon of
l^ffiyrf/c
/iSJJ^^
/^^(^
H^^'^ £
^ ' \^
.2.
Zonp or use dlsbict In which premises are situated _ii_
Is property a flood zone? Y
N
^y\
3. Tax fk/lap Description: Section
H O
Block
di
Lot
il5l
4. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed constnjction.
i
a. Existing use and occupancy
y^r"
>^ "
I
i
n
'^
K
b.
ntendeIntended
d
ususe
e
anand
d
occuoancoccupancv
y
/XI
5. Nature of work (check if applicable)
New BIdg Q Addition D Alteration^
Repair D Removal D
Demolition D Other Q
XU K
£jiir£,7'^>^9
6/9'S£jn£/yT
/^''^^'^^^O
6.. Is this a comer
tot?
>jj?3
^~^
/
Dimensions of entire new construction. Front H-S'f/ L
K U Depth lil_i!.'Height_Z_ No. of stones _l A
8. If dwelling, number of dwelling units:
Number of dwelBng units wi each floor
Number of bedrooms
>
Baths
>
Toilets
i>
Heating Plant: Gas
X j
Oil.
BectrK/Hol Air
^^
Hot Water
If Garage, number of cars
IL
9. If business, commerdd or mixed occupswicy, spedfy nature and extent of each type of use
10,
Estimated cost
A? 7

0^
I ^^
I
<^^^^
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
62A.B
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR, ORANGE COUNTY. NEW YORK
PyasuzvX io
New York
Z\ZXQ
Building
CQ^^ 9X\^
Town Ordinances
Building Inspector Michael
L
Babcocit
BIdg Insp Examined.
Asst Inspectors Franic Usi & Louis Kiychear
Fire insp Examined.
New
Windsor Town Hall
Approved.
555 Union Avenue
'
Disapproved.
NewWindsor, New York 12553
PennitNo.
1_
(914)563-4618
(914)56^693 FAX
WSTRUCTWNS
A. This application must be completely filled in by typewriter or In Ink and submitted In duplicate to the Building Inspector.
B. Plot jdan showing k)cation of tot and buildings on premises, relationship to adjcwiing premises or publk; streets or areas, and gmng a detailed
description of layout of property must be drawn on the diagram, which is part of this application.
C. This applfcation must be accompanied by two complete sets of plans showing proposed construction and two complete sets of
spedfk»tions. Plans and specifications shall describe the nature of ttie work to be performed, the materials and equipment to be used and
Installed and details of stmctural, mechanical and plumbing installations.
D. The woric covered by this application may not be commenced before ttie issuance of a Building Permit
E. Upon approval of tills appfication. the Building Inspector will issue a Building Pemnit to ttie applicant together witfi approved set of plans and
spedfications. Such permit and approved plans and specifications shall be kept on tiie premises, available for Inspection throughout tiie
progress of the work,
F. No building shall be occupied or used in ^ole or In part for any purpose whatever until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been granted
by the Building Inspector.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Inspector for the issuance of a BuiWing Pemnlt pursuant to the New Yofk Building Construction
Code Ordinances of the Town of New Windsor for ttie construction of buildings, additions, or alterations, or for removal or demolitfon or use of
property as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply witfi all applicable laws, ordinances, regulati'ons and certifies that he is the owner
Of agent of all tiiat certain tot, piece or pared of land and/or building described in tills application and rf not ttie owner, ttiat he has been duly and
property autiiorized to make Oils application and to assume responsibility for tiie owner in cpnnection witti this application.
.
J
(SianatQfe of Applicant)
(Address of Applicant)
V/w^
Iriv^iQA
(Owner's Signature)
(Owner's Address)
''
^fifLffA
PLOTPIAH
rff
CTl^ ^^
NOTE:
Locate all buildings and indicate all set back dimensions. Applicant must indicate the
^
^"fL^]^
building line or lines cleariy and distinctiy on the drawinas.
^^

w

Ph PliUi^ I'^irnjUudd^ S-oruk h\\\ -\o
*
(\^f\\ca&Q ktHino ^UJ^a^,
PUBUC NOTICE OF HEARING
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the TOWN OF
NEW WINDSOR, New York, will hold a Public Hearing pursuant to Section 48>34A of the
Zoning Local Law on the following Proposition:
Appeal No.
)i
Request of
(Jhmin^n
JfiarCJUiO,
for a VARIANCE of the 2!:oning Local Law to Permit:
being a VARL^^CE of Section
i^-lSl-
\Me.
p{ iJ^filJf. Po^<;.-<^5. /^
f-h
for property situated as follows:
known and designated as tax map Section
^t
, Blk. Q? Lot JZQ .
PUBLIC HEARING will take place on the ^"^dav of -Juhj^
*«Lfl »* t^c
New Windsor Town Hall, 555 Union Avenue, New Windsor, New York beginning at 7:30
o'clock P.M.
Chairman I



TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE
Date:
Ju/ift t^ ^'Dt>tX
ftppiicani:
xnrorma-cion:
|
i
'.,.*^
.
"" f\
(a) 'i:ief)oin^g_jiYiaj^^
(Name, address and phone of Applic^rrt) v)
(Owner)
^Applicant information:
'
-
(^"«^^t^^^* !
(b)
(Name, address and phone of purchaser or lessee)
(c)
(Name, address and phone of attorney)
(d) __^
(Name, address and phone of contractor/engineer/architect)
II. Application type:
( ) Use Variance
( ) Sign Variance
(_2S_) Area Variance
(
^
) Interpretation
III. Property Information:
,^ •
(a)
k-5 ^^3Laj&^
^-:i'^o-?^j(j&o
(Zone) (Addrei's)'
~ (S B L) (Lot size)
(b) What other zones lie within 500 ft.? NL
(c) Is a pending sale or lease subject ^to ZBA approval of this
application? UJLS.
.
(d) When was property purchased by present owner?
1^97,
.
(e) Has property been subdivided previously? K1 Q
.
(f) Has property been siibject of variance previously?
/\D
If so, when?
^^
.
(g) Has an Order to Remedy Violation been issued against the
property by the Building/Zoning Inspector?
No
.
(h) Is there any outside storage at tjie property now or is any
proposed? Describe in detail
e at the ]
il:
i\\9^.
IV. Use Variance./^|||V
(a) Use Variance requested from New Windsor Zoning Local Law,
Section
, Table of
Regs., Col.
to allow:
(Describe proposal)

(b) The legal standard for a "use" variance is unnecessary
hardship. Describe why you feel unnecessary hardship will result
unless the use variance is granted. Also set forth any efforts you
have made to alleviate the hardship other than this application.
(c) Applicant must fill out and file a Short Environmental
Assessment Form (SEQR) with this application.
(d) The property in question is located in or within 500 ft. of a
County Agricultural District: Yes No .
If the answer is Yes, an agricultural data statement must be submitted
along with the application as well as the names of all property owners
within the Agricultural District referred to. You may request this
list from the Assessor's Office.
i/v. Area variance:
(a) Area variance requested from New Windsor Zoning Local Law,
Section tf?-Arable of USCAo^l K Regs., Col. E-
Proposed or
Variance
Requirements
Available
Request
Min. Lot Area
Min. Lot Width _
Reqd. Front
YdTZWSZZIZ
ZHS^ZL^IZ
^Of-J^.^l.
Reqd. Side Yd.
^
Reqd. Rear Yd.
Reqd. Street
Frontage*
Max. Bldg. Hgt.
Min. Floor Area*
Dev. Coverage*
Floor Area Ratio**
Parking Area
* Residential Districts only
** No-residential districts only
•^ (b) In making its determination, the ZBA shall take into
, consideration, among other aspects, the benefit to the applicant if
f the variance is granted as weighed against the detriment to the
\ health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such
J
grant. Also, whether an undesirable change will be produced in the
\ character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will
i be created by the granting of the area variance; (2) whether the
/ benefit soucfht by the applicant can be achieved by some other method
( feasible for the applicant to pursue other than an area variance; (3)

whether the requested area variance is substantial; (4) whether the
proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the
physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district;
and (5) whether the alleged difficulty was self-created.
Describe why yoii believe the ZBA should grant your application for an
area, variance: ,
,
n ^ - A ^
*"
(You may attach additional paperwork if more space is needed)
VI. Sign Variance:
///ft•
(a) Variance requested from New Windsor Zoning Local Law,
Section
,
Regs.
Sign 1
Sign -
Sign 3
Sign
Requirements
Proposed or Variance
Available
Request
(b) Describe in detail the sign(s) for which you seek a
variance, and set forth your reasons for requiring extra or over size
signs.
(c) What is total area in square feet of all signs on premises
including signs on windows, face of building, and free-standing signs?
i/VII. Interpretation.
(a) Interpretation requested of New Windsor Z
section _iliia,^ , Table of ^^ hgtiOo
Col. __^
.
I
(b)
Zoning Local Law,
Regs.,A
escribe in detail the proposal befoj^e^th

Back to top


'Er*-^
NJi^^A'
Vlll.
Additional comments:
(a) Describe any conditions or safeguards you offer to ensure
that the quality of the zone and neighboring zones is maintained or

upgraded and that the intent and spirit of the New Windsor Zoning is
fostered. (Trees, landscaping, curbs, lighting, paving, fencing,
screening, sign limitations, utilities, drainage.)
IX. Attachments required:
t^ Copy of referral from Bldg./Zoning Insp. or Planning Bd.
\^
Copy of tax map showing adjacent properties.
— Copy of contract of sale, lease or franchise agreement.
^X
Copy of deed and title policy.
t^^
Copy(ies) of site plan or survey showing the size and
location of the lot, the location of all buildings,
facilities, utilities, access drives, parking areas,
trees, landscaping, fencing, screening, signs, curbs,
paving and streets within 200 ft. of the lot in question.
Copy(ies) of sign(s) with dimensions and location.
^\y
Two (2) checks, one in the amount of $
^.(xo
and the second
check in the amount of
$3^-^.,
each payable to the TOWN
OF NEW WINDSOR.
\y
Photographs of existing premises from several angles.
X. Affidavit.
4^
Date;
LJ^ joo
STATE OF NEW YORK)
) SS. :
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
The undersigned applicant, being duly sworn, deposes and states
that the infoinnation, statements and representations contained in this
application are true and accurate to the best of his/her knowledge or
to the best of his/or information and belief. The applicant further
understands and agrees that the Zoning Board of Appeals may take
action to rescind any variance granted if the conditions or situation
presented herein are materially changed.
Sworn to before me this
('^
(Applicant)
MICHEU LEE NEUSCH. ESa
^
^Y'x\r\P
"IPOO
Notanr Public State of NcwYorfc
of
J Un <C^
, ±^
No. 02NE5073281
Qualified in Orange County ,j «^ /
Commission Expires February 18,
.2L2SJ
ZBA Action:
.
(a) Public Hearing date:
(p
j<Q^ jOx^

(b) Variance: Granted ( ) Denied (
(c) Restrictions or conditions:
NOTE: A FORMAL DECISION WILL FOLLOW UPON RECEIPT OF THE PUBLIC
HEARING MINUTES WHICH WILL BE ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION OF ZONING BOARD OF
APPEALS AT A LATER DATE.
(ZBA DISK#7-080991.AP)

Ortqinal
#:273628
C.B. CARRIER & LAZIKR REALTORS 914-534-5555 05/22/00 MENA ZAPATA
CNTY !
ZONE :
SECT :
BLK :
LOT :
ACRE :
IRR :
LDESC;
WTRA :
STYLE
CONST
B3MT
#CAR
R2M1
REM2
REM3
REM4
DIR
EQUIP:
INTER:
ROOMS:
SQFTl:
EXTER:
HEAT :
WTR :
TAX$ :
search criteria
OIJANGS TAX#
AREA
*048.000 ST#
*0(i02 LOG
*oi0.000 RDFR
.26 DEP
N
LJVEL
N
*620
*53
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
3348Q0.048.000-0002-020.000/0000
PO
; NEW,WINDSOR
SDIR:
ST:*LAFAYETTE DR
#:
STATUS;
ZIP : 12553
SDES: LP:$
273628
IPW
139000*
SIDE
ATTIC
BRICK ,
SCUTTLE,
R INCH
FiLAME /
Y/FULL ,FINISH
1/GARAGE /ATTACH .^
aiAPMING 6. WELL MAINTAINED, NICELY
TUATED ON CORNER
DJ lUGHTER, FURNACE 4
OiD, DOUBLE INSULAtlON A3CVE ATTIC
RT. 9W TO LAFAYETTF, SEE SIGN
I>[TERIOR AND EXTERIOR INFORMATION
W^HER, DRYER , RANGE ,REFRIG,
,HWFLRX,W/WCPT,
F^
1080
StRENX, STORMX, THRMVfX,
FA
MVNCIP!
3391
-~- INFORMATION DEEMED REE
* 75 00 XST :
*150!00 STRT: PUBLIC /PAVED
SCH :*CORNWALL
ELM : LEE.ROAD
JR : WILLOW,AVENUE,MS
HI : CORNWALL.CENTRAL.HS
— GENERAL INFORMATION
APPEAR: VG YRBT
FUEL:
SWR
INCL
HOAINCLd
ZND:
LEASE;
IMAGE;
:*195o/ACTUAL
LOT POSSIBLE MTHER/
YRS OLD, SEPTIC 6 YRS
#BD:* 3/ 4 #BA:
DINE : FORMAL .
DRIVE : BLKTOP ,
SF.FIN:* 1080
2,0
SQFT2;
SQFT3:
CB
FINANCIAL INFORMATION -
GAS ,
HTZN: 1 ELEC:
SEPTIC,
AC : NONE ,
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
, ,
TAX.RPT: 09/99 EXEM
.TABLE BUT NOT GUARANTEED
#AC : 0
N ANN.HOA! $
05/22/00 04:02 PM

M«1i*
THIS INDENTURE, made the I^O
day of
November
, r>ir»eteen hundred and gj^q^^y.ggyg
BETWEEN DAVID H. COWAN, JR., residing at 20 Lafayette St.,
Newburgh, New York 12550 and JANET M. COWAN, residing at 8 Harriso
Street, Middletown, N.Y. 10940
party of the first part, and DOMINGO MARCANO and ALEJANDRINA MARCANO, husband
and wife, both residing at 49 Benkard Avenue, Newburgh, N.Y. 1255C
party of the second part,
WITNESSETH, that the party of ttie first part, in consideration of Ten Dollars and other valuable considcrati
paid by the party of the second part, dues hereby grant and release unto the party of the second part, the he
or successors and assigns of the party of the second part forever,
ALL that certain plot, piece or parcel uf land, with the l>uildin|{s and improvements thereon erected, situu
lyinp and lieinp in the Town of New Windsor, County of Orange and State of
. New York and more particularly described on Schedule "A",
annexed hereto and made a part hereof.
TOCETHEK with all ri«;ht, title and interest, if any, ul the party of the first part in and to any strceU
roads abutting the above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGKTHER with the appurlcna
and all the estate and rights of the parly of the first part in and to said premises; TO HAVE AND TO fH
the premises herein granted unto the party of the second part, the heirs or successors and assigns of the pari
the second part forever.
e^Mw
v^m( i I' i J—
I'^AIVtJ^ the'nn'fty'WNHI; first part covenants lliat the party of ttic first part has not dune or suffered anything whc
^(t"'Kaid.^<^l5ft(Wr^lW? been cnc:unil)crcd in any way whatever, except as aforesaid.
*ATTOTh<^^af^'Jf the first part, in compliance with Section 13 of the Lien Law, covenants that tl»e party of the
part will receive the consideration for this conveyance and will hold the right to receive such consideration
trust fund to be a{^ied first fur the purpose of paying the cost of the improvement and will apply the same fii
the payment of the cost of the improvement before using any part of the total of the same for any other purpo
'Hie word "party" fhall lie ronslrued as if it read "parlies" whenever the sense of this indenture so requires.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of llic first part ha? duly executed this deed the day and year first r
writlett.
IN TRESENCE J»F:
'^^v.vv\A)T\Lg^c:v^)ei(.-

Janet M. Cowan
to mr> known to be the individual
described in and who
cxecufrd the foregoing instrument, and acknowIed«;cd lliat
she
executed the same.
j^^-'-^y^
^/^
Notary Public
TOOOA-KOSOH _
Motwy
Pubiie. StM* o(
N«w VM
OuaiWwrt in Orany
CwMinr.
^.-^
Ho. 4870143
„Cr 3
STATE OF
New YORK. COUKTY
Of
On the
day of
19
, before me
personally came
to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depow and
s.iy ihat
he resides at No,
«
thai
he is the
of
, the corporation described
in and which executed the foregoing instrument; that
he
knoKs the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed
to said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was .to
itnixril by order of die board of directors of said corpora-
tion, and that
he signed h
name thereto by like order.
to nie known to be the individual
exr«:ute<l the foregoing instrument,
he
executed the same.
described in and who
and a(jcnflwk:t)i;cd tliat
Notary Public ^^
STATE OF NffW YORK,
COUNTY
OF
On the
day of
19
t before me
personally came
the subscribing witness to the foregoing instrument, with
whom I am personally acquaintc«l, who, Iwinp by me duly
sworn, did depose and say that
he resides at No.
Ihat
he knows
to be the individual
dcscrilied in and who executed the foregoing instmmrnl;
that
he, said subscribing witnr.«», was present and saw
execute the same; and that
he, said witness,
at the same time subscribed h
name as witness thereto.
•I ••'.TV riTL'^ .-J
• '"\Hr/
i.o
?
ft-"
n
t •
-•••lu.'lA
:i.v ... :c.v. ^^..,.:J
IBargatn anti £»aU 9Beeb
WITH COTEWART ACAINST CaAirroii's Acn
TrTLE No.
O ^
^
6^/3^^ f
DAVID H. COWAN, JR. and
JANET M. COWAN
TO
DOMINGO MARCANO and ALEJANDRINA
MARCANO, husband and wife
SECTION 48
BLOCK 2
LOT
20
«?reRWP<9WCT0WN of New Windsor
RETURN BY MAIL TO:
Sandra L. Carr, Esq.
427 Little Britain Rd.
P.O. Box 3263
Newburgh, N.Y.
Zip No.
12550
•-KS2S37 « 257

MIDDLE DEPARTMENTj^U^SJgECTlON AGENCY,INC. Sect 48-2-20
Date
May 15, 2000
Certifies
that the electricalwiring to the electrical equipment listed below'has been examined and is
approved as being in accora with the National Electrical Code, applicable governmental, utility and Agency rules
in effect on the date noted at>ove and is issued subject to the following conditions.
Domingo Marcano
Owner.
Occupant:
Location:
Applicant:
Same
i i
53 LaFayette Dr.
New Windsor, N.Y.
Basement
SEE OVER
fDomingo Marcano
53 LaFayette
New Windsor, N.Y
12553
_J
Occupanqy: Dwellingi:
\
'TM» c«rtincai« appliM only to ttw eloctricai wiring to the electrical equipment listed t)eiow and the
; .Imtallalion'inspecMd.as iha'itove noted date based on a visual inspection. No warranty is
. ; iwpresMd or impiad'w to th* nwchanical safety, effkaency or fitness of the equipment for any
\
!particuiarpurpaM.*ThiscertiiicaM(hallbevaMtoraperiodc<or»yearfromtheaboveno(eddate.
^ ' Should ttw eleclrical system to which ttiis certificate applies be altered in any way, includtng but
not limited to, the introduction of additional electrical equpment and/or the replacement of any of
the components installed as o( the aboye noted dale, this certificae shal be immediately nuH and
void. This certificate applies only to the use, occupancy and ownershp as indicated herein. Upon
a change in the use. occupancy or ownerehp of the property inC<cated above, this certificate shall
be immedidely null «nd void. In the event ttiat this certiicate becomes invalid based
vpon
the
above condiUons. this certiiicaie may be revalidated upon reinspect'ion by Middle Department Irv-
' spection Agency.' Inc^ An/ipplicition tor inspection must be strijmitted to Mid<^ Department
Inspection Agertcy, Inc. to
\aeiM»
the inspection and revalidaiion process. A fee will be charged
i " lor this service.'
.,.-:•
14-91565
•^i^
Form No. 704 7-94

An Electrical Survey has been made of the visible portion of
electrical equipment in the premises indicated. No obvious
unsatisfactory condition vas found.

PHINl OH lYKt U^>^-^ ININ t'««.if
D'avid U. Cowan, Jr. and Janet M.
3
Cowan '
TO
Domingo Marcano and Alejandrina
Marcano
-I
13
•o
ATTACH THIS SHEET TO THE FIRST PAGE OF EACH
I flECOROeO INSTRUMENT ONLY.
\)\>''^'^
\\V^^
•J
u
DO NOT WRITE BELO
CONTROL NO.
r}T>m.v\
RECORD AND RETURN TO:
(Name and Ac^Jress)
Sandra L. Carr, Esq.
427 Little Britain Rd., P.O. Box 3262
Newburgh, N.Y. 12550
INSTRUMENT TYPE: DEED
BG20 Blooming Grove
CH22 Chester
C024 Cornwall
CR26 Crawford
DP28 Oeerpark
GOdO Goshen
GR32 Greenville
HA34 Hamplonburgh
HI36
Highland
MK3d Minisink
ME40 Monroe
MY42 Montgomery
MH44 Mount Hope
NT46 Newburgh (T)
NW46 New Windsor
TU50 Tuxedo
WL52 Wallkill
WK54 Warwick
WA56 Wawayanda
WOsa Woodbur/
MN09 Middletown
NC11 Newburgh
PJ13
Port Jervis
9999
Hold
7
DATE
AFFIDAVIT FILED
19
ir
MORTGAGE
SERIAL NO.
SATISFACTION
ASSIGNMENT
OTHER
Mortgage Amount $
Exempt
Yes ^ _
CHECK
CASH
No
3-6 Cooking Units Yes
No
Received Tax on above Mortgage
Basic
$
MTA
$
Spec. Add. $
TOTAL
$
MORTGAGE TAX
TRANSFER TAX
RECORD. FEE
REPORT FORMS
CERT. COPIES
. CHARGE _
%
.
MARION S. MURPHY
Orange County Clerk
by:
k^^c
//
r
y.^&^
ORANGE COUNTY Ct.ERK'S QFFICE S.S.
Recofded on tj^e '^ -o/^^'^ay ©f
f'^
M. inJLJber/Film
page
o;Cloc^-v_
'c^^
and examined.
County Clerk
RECEIVED
£i\aEAL ESTATE
TRANSFTRANSFERTAE
X
^
ORANGE COUNTy.V.
LK^2837ru 254

i\
BEJIIWING at a point in the easterly line of a proposed street or roadway to
be known as Lafayetto Drive, the said roadway being hereinafter described; the s«id
point of beginning being a distance of 200 feet ).)easured on a course south
54 degrees 51 minutes east from a point in the easterly line of Route 9W, which said
point in 9W is a distance of 306.2 feet measured southwesterly along the said line
of 9W from the nr^rtherly line of the land heretofore conveyed by William I.. NicoU
and Elizabeth B. Nicoll and Anne Camac Micoll VUghtman to the Andrea Corporation by
deed dated December 22, 1950 and recorded in the Orange County Clerk's Office on
December 26, 1950 in tiber 1183 of Deeds at paga 472/ and runs thence from said
point of beginning along the easterly line of said Lafayette Drive north 35 degrees
09 minutes east 65 feet to a point of curvature, laid out to widen the approach to
a right angle bend in said roadwayi thence along said curve with a radius of 10
feet a distance of 15.71 foet measured along the arc of said curve to a point of
tangency with the southerly line of Lafayette Drive; thence along said line south
54 degrees 51 minutes east 140 feet to a point/ thence south 35 degrees 09 mxnucek
west 75 feet to a point; thence^north 54 degrees 51 minutes west 150 feet to the
point or place of beginning.
TOGETHER with the right to the use of a roadway, in coiwnon with others, which
roadway is fifty feet in width, leading from Route 9W to and beyond the above
described parcelf the centerline of said roadway being described as follows:
The said centerline of said roadway begins at a point in the easterly line
of Route 9W, the said point being a distance of 481.2 foet measured in a south-
westerly direction along the easterly line of 9W from the northerly line of snid
Andrea Corporation line and runs thence south 54 degrees 51 minutes east 175 feet
to a point; thence north 35 degrees 09 minutes east 275 foot to a point; thence
south 54 degrees 51 minutes east 175 feet to a point. The said roadway embraces
a width of 25 feet on each side of the above described centerline.
BEING the same promises described in deed Frances Profaci to Charles H.
Bertilina and Hazel M. Bertilina, his wife, dated April 30, 1956 and recorded
May 2, 1956 in Liber 1364 of Deeds at page 467 in the Ora/ige County Clerk's Office,
the said Charles K. Bertilina having died on May 30, 1971, a resident of the Town
of New Windsor, Orange County, New York.
BEING the same premises conveyed in a deed dated February 24,
1984, from Hazel M. Bertilina to David H. Cowan, Jr. and Janet M.
Cowan, and recorded in the Orange County Clerk's Office on March
5, 1984 in Liber 2275 of Deeds at Page 316.
'JtirXb'j?
fi*
25o

Date
UQ..
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
TOWN HALL, 555}UNION AVENUE
NEW WINDSOR, NEW YORK 12553
.,19.
TO
FranceaHotti
168 N. Drury Lane
.Mewbuf^h...N.y..1255Q.
DR.
DATE
CLAIMED
ALLOWED
^/ ^
^>7/-?;^
f^rf/
/yi'y^
Ol^-P^
"(harfnno
- "7
ys-'OO
Me
€L.
-3
UCfhiernrr^
-3
%
/>/5-
%
'area
-
%
U/hyt/'/^
2^
l(p2\0S
2L6.
>g^y^

Back to top


22Z
Oz.

STATE OF NEW YORK,
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
^ss.
Jnv":
I hereby certify, that the items ofCtiiis account are correa; that the disbursements and services
charged therein have in fact been made and rendered, aiidJ^ithat no part thereof has been paid or satisfied, tbait the
amount herein mentioned is in full settlement for all services rendered and^materials furnished.
(^Sign Here
I:
09
CO
D
g
B
<
o
+J •- T'-
CO
•a
o

Back to top


S =3
I
CO
53;
f4r
VaS
\*
.o.
<
E
e
o
•a
§
ag
«a
5
b
»
5
€>
5-.

May 22, 2000
2
PRELIMINARY MEETING;
MARCANO. DOMINGO
MR. NUGENT: Request for use variance/interpretation of
two-family residence in an R-5 zone located at 53
Lafayette Drive in an R-5 zone.
Carol Stone, Esq. appeared before the board for this
proposal.
MS. STONE: I'm Carol Garafallo Stone, I'm standing in
for Michele Neusch, attorney for the Marcanos. If I
may, with respect to the use variance and
interpretation of the two-family residence, I would
like to point out that there's a, in the basement area
which is a walk-in basement, there's a kitchen,
bathroom and family room that was constructed in 1987
before my clients bought the home. And it was actually
constructed for the purpose of handicap accessible, an
elderly woman, relative of the previous owners had
lived there, they had a shower that was handicapped
accessible and all the accouterments of an area where
handicapped person could use it. It's never been used
as a two-family house. It was listed'for sale as a
one-family house. My clients use it for a
laundry-family room, an entertainment area for their
family and a guest area for when one of their adult
sons visits. But it's never been rented as an
apartment and never used in the 13 years that they have
owned it and even previous owners never used it as a
rental apartment.
MS. BARNHART: May I add something, Mr. Chairman, when
you announced there was another variance that's also
required right, Michael, there's a 40 foot 6 inch front
yard variance for an existing deck, it's a front yard.
MR. BABCOCK: Yes, front yard.
MR. TORLEY: It's a corner lot.
MS. STONE: I can address that as well.
(Whereupon, Mr. Krieger entered the room.)

May 22, 2000
MS. STONE: yhat part there was a very small deck on
the house when my clients bought it in 1987 off the
kitchen with a regular door entrance to the deck, if I
may approach and show you a recent photograph, do you
have this one?
MR. NUGENT: I believe we do.
MS. STONE: That it was off the door, this part with
the stairs was the original deck and then this one to
the side to the left side was what was added. That
addition was added in 1990 by my clients. It was built
by a contractor who's now deceased, I think you have
the name on the permit application.
MR. NUGENT: Of the lawyer?
MS. STONE: No, of the contractor who extended the
deck, if you don't, I have it in my file. You don't
have it? Hold on.
MR. KANE: Michael, are they here because it's two
front yards?
MR. BABCOCK: That's correct.
MR. KANE: That's the only reason they're here for the
deck. We can move over to the use thing right now.
MR. NUGENT: It's not relevant.
MS. STONE: And it was built for $1,500 and they are
across from the hotel and have two neighbors that have
had notice of this deck since 1990, appreciate the fact
that my clients improved their property, it looks very
nice, they've never had a complaint about the deck and
has improved the value of all the surrounding
properties as well. When my clients listed this
property for sale, without the deck, the value of the
property is at least $15,000 lower than it is with the
deck and that estimate we have directly from the
listing broker. And it would cause an economic
hardship to my clients because Mrs. Marcano is disabled
from a worker's compensation injury and also receives

May 22, 2000
4
SSA and Mr. Marcano has been diagnosed with Parkinson's
disease as of two years ago and is retiring in June of
this year, due to the Parkinson's disease and the
failure to get this variance without this deck, the
sale of the property will fall through, the buyers do
not want the property without the deck and without the
use of it, so my clients would suffer a great economic
hardship without this variance.
MR. REIS: May I ask you a question please, your name
again?
MS. STONE: Carol Stone.
MR. REIS: Where is this interpretation for a two
family, how does this come into play?
MS. STONE: Well—
MR. REIS: Is that required also for the sale of the
property?
MS. STONE: No, it's been listed, it was listed in 1987
as a one family and it's listed this time from the real
estate as a one family. The way it come into being is
the latest tax assessment said that it appeared to be a
two family because it had a kitchen, like a little
kitchenette and a bathroom, handicapped accessible
bathroom on the basement floor in the basement, which
is a walk-in basement, so it was never characterized.
MR. KANE: Separate utilities for the bottom portion of
the house?
MS. STONE: No.
MR. KANE: Have there ever been?
MS. STONE: No.
MR. TORLEY: They're not asking for it to be two
family?
MS. STONE: No, they want to keep it the way it's
always been, 13 years they've never rented this area

May 22, 2000
5
out as a separate apartment.
MR. KRIEGER: It's a one, they have treated it like a
one family home, it's in the neighborhood of one family
homes. other than this tax assessment, they're always
assumed it's a one family home, that's the way they're
selling it as a one family home?
MS. STONE: Right, they bought it as one family, it's
listed as a one family.
MR. KRIEGER: You should understand that the building
inspector and tax assessor don't work together. If
your complaint is not with the building inspector, your
complaint is with the tax assessor and that should,
those taxes, that's a matter that should be grieved
through the tax assessor. This board has no power to
order the tax assessor to do or not do anything, has no
power, no power over the tax assessor.
MS. STONE: Well, the question, the original question
is how did this issue arise, you know, to begin it
didn't arise with the sale.
MR. KANE: They have to be hereofor a denial, right?
MR. BABCOCK: They're here for the deck, for one thing.
What they've done is I don't think this applicant did
and that's what they're stating prior to them, they
finished this basement, they didn't get a permit to
finish the basement, so that's where we came into play,
when we did the research with the assessor's office,
the assessor's office says it's an illegal two-family
house, they converted it and she feels it's two
families, so she's really got to discuss in with the
assessor's office.
MR. NUGENT: It's not being taxed as a two family?
MR. BABCOCK: Yes.
MS. STONE: Yes, the taxes were increased.
MR. BABCOCK: She has to convince the assessor one way
or the other what she could do to make the assessor

May 2 2, 2 00 0
6
change it back to a one-family house, that's what she
needs to do..* All she needs to do is get a building
permit for the work done there, electrical inspection
and we'll go and inspect it.
MR. NUGENT.: Can we give them a variance for the deck?
MR. BABCOCK: Yes.
MR. KANE: Do we need to make an interpretation that we
feel it's a one-family home?
MR. NUGENT: We can do that.
MS. STONE: I think it does because now the issue has
been brought up in this forum as well it initiated in
the tax assessor's office but it's here as a permit
application.
MR. KRIEGER: I'm not sure that a finding here is
going, the tax assessor's going to consider it binding.
MR. KANE: I don't mean it in that light, as far as
Mike giving them a permit, you'd probably be here
anyway-under; those circumstances. :• ;^
MR. BABCOCK: That's correct.
MR. KRIEGER: But the difference is as I understand it,
there's the deck question and the two family question,
right, the deck question being an area variance and the
two family being potentially a use variance
interpretation and/or use variance. Both area
variances I would agree with you, if they were use
variances, but they are not, there's one of each and
one of the other. I think before she goes to the
expense of what's required in a use, to obtain a use
variance, they ought to find out with the tax assessor
whether or not this board's decision will, the tax
assessor will consider binding. Then, if the answer is
yes, they may decide to go ahead. If the answer is no,
then the options are up to them whether they decide to
go ahead here or whether they grieve it through the tax
grievance process. Those are controversies that the
applicant has to decide.

May 22, 2000
MR. TORLEY: Mike, if you absent the tax assessor's
roll, if you walk, when you walked into this building,
would you have, as you have had in the past, been
conservative, said that this is a two-family house?
MR. BABCOCK: I think so, I didn't personally go there
but I think that's why the issue's here tonight.
MR. TORLEY: Since the applicant is not seeking this to
be a two-family house, not asking for that, we need the
interpretation at some point during the process, we
have to go to the public hearing for the deck anyway
during that part of the public hearing, the applicant—
MR. KANE: Actually, for both.
MR. TORLEY: --the applicant can state that this is a
one-family house, make the case and if the evidence
warrants say this is a one-family house and move on to
the deck.
MR. KRIEGER: It's not an interpretation/use variance,
it's just an interpretation.
MR. KANE: Look for a use or interpretation.
MR. KRIEGER: Yeah, no, but they are not looking for a
use variance cause they don't want to change it, they
are looking for an interpretation.
MS. STONE: My clients don't want it to be a two-family
house.
MR. TORLEY: In that case, I would move that we set up
the applicant for a public hearing on the requested
interpretation of the building layout and the required
front yard variances for the deck.
MR. KANE: Second it.
ROLL CALL
MR. KANE
AYE

May
22, 2000
8
MR. REIS
AYE
MR. MCDONALD
AYE
MR. TORLEY
AYE
MR. NUGENT
AYE
MR. NUGENT; You have your paperwork•for the public
hearing?
MS. STONE: No.
MS. BARNHART: I gave out four sets of paperwork to
several different people on this thing.
MS. STONE: Not to Miss Neusch.
MS. BARNHART: Yeah, she was in my office.
MS. STONE: Well, it's not in the file and, you know,
we can come back this week and get it.
MR. TORLEY: Come back and get it.
MS. BARNHART: Michele has it, I gave it to her last
Friday.
MS. STONE: So the paperwork for the public hearing.
MS. BARNHART: If she doesn't have it, she can call me.
MS. STONE: Thank you.
MR. TORLEY: Anything else you'd like the applicant to
bring with her?
MR. KRIEGER: No. There's nothing that I have to bring
with them, you might, since she isn't here, you might
ask her to review 2 67 of the Town Law before she comes,
267 small a.
MS. STONE: Does that by any chance set the parameters
for a variance?
MR. KRIEGER: Yeah, it's what has to be shown.
MS. STONE: Okay.

OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR
ORANGE COUNTY, NEW.XpRK
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
APPLICANT IS TO PLEASE CONTACT THE ZONING BOARD
SECRETARY AT (914)563-4630 TO
MAKE
AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE
ZONING
BOARD OF
APPEALS.
DATE: April 10,2000
APPLICANT: Domingo Marcano
C/OAttomey Michael Hergenhan
53 Lafeyette Dr
37 Westwood Dr
New Windsor, New York 12553
Newburgh, 12550
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT YOUR APPLICATION
FOR : Existing 6' Stockade Fence
LOCATED AT: 53 Lafeyette Dr
ZONE: R-5
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING SITE: 48-2-20
IS DISAPPROVED ON THE FOLLOWING GROUNDS:
LExisting 6'Stockade Fence installed without a permit projects closer to road than existing house. This is
a corner lot.

PERMITTED 4'
PROPOSED OR
VARIANCE
AVAILABLE:
REQUEST:
ZONE: R-5
USE:48-14-C-(l)-(C)[.l]
MIN. LOT AREA;
MIN LOT WIDTH:
REQ'D. FRONT YD:
REQ'D.SIDEYD:
REQD. TOTAL SIDE YD:
REQ'D REAR YD:
REQ'D FRONTAGE:
MAX. BLDG. HT.:
FLOOR AREA RATIO:
MIN. LIVABLE AREA:
DEV. COVERAGE:
cc: Z.B.A., APPLICANT, FILE ,W/ ATTACHED MAP

PLEASE AaOW FIVE TO TEN DAYS TO PROCESS
UtPORTAMT
YOU MUST CALL FOR ALL REQUREO INSPECTIONS OF CONSTRUCTION
Other inspectkjnsvirii) be made in most cases but those Ksiedbekwinust be made or Certi1k:ale of C>ccupanc^
Donotmistake
an unscheduled inspection for one of those listed bek)w. Unless an inspection report is left on the job indicating approval of one of these inspectksns it
has not been approved and it is improper to continue beyond that point in the worH. Any disapprove^vi^ must be reinspected after corection.
' ?•
.
1. Wh^ excavating is oimplete and footing fonns are in pi%e (before pouring.)
2. Foundation inspection. Check here for waterproofing and footing drains.
3. Inspect gravel base under concrete tkjors and underslab plumbing.
4. When framing, rough plumbing, rough eiectnc and before being covered:
5. insulation.
6. Final kispecfion for Certificate of Occupancy. Have on hand eiectricai inspection data and final certified plot plan. Building is to be
completed at this time. Weil water test required and engineer's certificaliisn letter for septic system required.
7. Driveway inspection must meet approval of Town Highway Superintendent A driveway bond may be required.
8. $50.00 diarge for any site ttiat calls for the inspection twfce.
9. Call 24 hours in advance, with pennit number, to schedule inspection.
10. There will be no inspections unless yeUow permit card is posted.
11. Sewer permits must be obtained along with buikling pennits for new houses.
12. Septic permit must be submitted with engineer's drawing and perc test
13. Road opening permits must be obtained from Town Cleric's office.
., 14. All building pennits will need a Certificate of Occupancy or a Certificate of Compliance and here is no fee for this.
AFRDAVIT
OF OWNERSHIP AND/OR CONTRACTOR'S
COMP & UABIUTYINSURANCE
CERTIFICATE IS
REQUIRED BEFORE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
Building Permit #: ^ ^y—^^-ZTTlTO
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
- FILL OUT AU INFORMATION WHICH APPUES TO YOU
Ov^ierofPrem-^es
^f^Kl^ ^
^
00^3^^ ^
I
^l£7A^
[j
fSf^
A
Address
^3
Ufft^jBT^
Dfll>J^
Phone 5^ A
?>i I
MailinoAddress
N^W
WP^DjoU
Ny
l^^63
Name of Architect U/^)^/^^ ^
-j J
^
Address
'
^Phone
Name of Contractor
Address
\
Phone
State whether applfcant is owner, lessee, agent, architect, engineer or buikJer
U
^ fitr/L
I
If appTicantis a corporation, signature of duly auttiorized officer.
(Name aid titie erf corporate officer)

1. On what street is property located? On the _
and
feet from the intersection of
2. Zone or use district in which premises are situated
IN"" >
is property a flood zone? Y
N x\^
3. Tax Map Description: Section,
_„ Block
' ^
Lot
^ Q
4. State existing use and occupancy of premises and intended use and occupancy of proposed construction.
i
a. Existing use and occupancy
Intended use and occupancy
5. Nature of work (check if applicable)
New Bldg D Addition D Alteration D
Repair Q Removal n
Demolition D Other^
6. Is this a comer lot?
vj ^ >
/
7. Dimensions of entire new construction. Front
Rear
Depth.
. Height.
8. If dwelling, number of dwelling units:
S
Number of dwelling units on each floor
sjj
Number of bedrooms
H
Baths
Toilets
CT
Heating Plant; Gas.
Electric/Hot Air
/ \
Hot V/ater
If Garage, number of cars
9. If business, commercial or mixed occupancy, specify nature and extent of eadi type of use
10. Estimated cost
O^r^lt^^ pUlC/fA\£0 JrJ fCj^Sf.

OH I of
I
jg'^P
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
date
TOWN OF NEW WINDSOR, ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK
Pursuant
to
New York State Buifding
Code and
Town Ordmances
Building Inspector IMlchaei L Babcock
""^-
BWg Insp Examined.
Asst InspcK^rs Frank Usi & Louis Krychear
^ r^y!
,
Fire Insp Examined.
New Windsor Town Hall
Approved.
555 Union Avenue
Disapproved.
New Windsor. New York 12563
Permit No.
(914) 563-4618
(914) 56^4693 FAX
r
INSTRUCTIONS
A. This application must be completely filled In by typewriter or in ink and submitted in dupficate to the Building Inspector.
B. Plot plan showing k)cation of lot and buildings on premises, reiatk)nship to adjoining premises or public streets or areas, and gi\nng a detailed
description of layout of property must t>e drawn on the diagram, which is part of this application.
C. This application must be accompanied by two complete sets of plans showing proposed construction and two complete sets of
specifications. Plans and spedficat'ons shall describe the nature of the work to be performed, the materials and equipment to be used and
Installed and details of stnictural. mechanical and plumbing installations.
D. The woric covered by this application may not be commenced before the issuance of a Building Pennit
E. Upon approval of this application, the Building Inspector will issue a Building Permit to the applicant together with approved set of plans and
spedfrcations. Such permit and approved plans and spedficafions shall be kept on the premises, available for inspection .throughout the
progress of the work.
F. No building shall be occupied or used In whole or
in
part for any purpose whatever until a Certificafe of Occupancy shall have been granted
by the Building Inspector.
APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE to the Building Inspedor for the issuance of a BuikJing Pennit pursuant to the New York Building Constmclion
Code Ordinances of the Town of New Windsor for the construction of buildings, additions, or alterations, or for removal or demolition or use of
property as herein described. The applicant agrees to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and certifies that he is the owner
or agent of all that certain lot. piece or parcel of land and/or building described In this application and if not the owner, that he has been duly and
jriy authorized to make this application and to assume responsibility for the ovimer in connection witti this application.
(Signature of Applicant)
(Address of Applicant)
w ^
wi^^^^^
(Owners Signature)
(Owner's Address)
nf
i
PLOT PUN
, / ijT/ijL"^
NOTE:
Locate ail buildings and indicate ail set back dimensions. Applicant must indrcate the
buildina line or lines cleariv and distinctiv on the drawinos.
L ' >
rim
'
JO
building line or lines cleariy and distinctly on the drawings

N
W
M^
si

Back to top